A Church Burns Down, and Perhaps Rebuilds

The fire that did “colossal damage” to Paris’ Notre Dame Cathedral dominated the news on Monday, and although we were disheartened by the tragedy we took some hope in that fact that at least respectful attention was being paid. The Notre Dame Cathedral was one of those glorious relics of western civilization and the Christian faith that for so long sustained it, and it’s good to see people still care about that.
The fire destroyed all the wood in the guts of the more-than-700-year-old building, including the iconic spire that topped its masterpiece architecture, but its stone base is reportedly still intact, and French President Emmanuel Macron has said that “I tell you solemnly tonight: We will rebuild this cathedral.” He added that “Notre Dame of Paris is our history. The epicenter of our lives. It’s the many books, the paintings, those that belong to all French men and French women, and even those who’ve never come.” We found his words encouraging, but they couldn’t quite convince us that the modern world can ever fully restore anything to the glory of the old world.
The Notre Dame Cathedral was built by the fervently Christian France of the 14th Century to the glory of God, and the secularized French people of the 21st Century will rebuild it as a tourist attraction and a monument to the glory of France. The modern world has some very amazing gizmos, and can perform astounding acts of engineering, but it can’t make up for that soulful difference.
There are many aesthetic theories to explain the ironic and rigorously logical and up-to-date appeal of modern architecture, but they cannot persuade us to abandon our preference for the older buildings. That’s true here in Wichita, where they’ve lately been building very fashionable structures, but the best of it is still the old County Courthouse and the Carnegie Library and the fabulous old City Hall and Scottish Rite Temple by the great Proudfoot and Bird and the rest of the stone structures that might survive a fire, and it’s true pretty much everywhere we go. Our only brief European travels have been in Ireland and Great Britain, but the old stuff was better there, too, and everyone we know who’s more widely travelled abroad went in search of the old rather than new.
There are also cases to be made for the modern books and paintings and the rest of the culture that Macron is rightly concerned with, and the modern world has also wrought such new art forms as cinema and “internet memes,” but even the most enthusiastic critics acknowledge a certain soullessness. Modernity has largely abandoned the very concept of the soul, and is too enlightened to imbue its art with that sense of awe at what mankind could hope to derive from God’s truth and beauty that those primitive Christians once had.
Most of the coverage focused on the loss of a historic Gothic architecture masterpiece in the heart of Paris, but it was also occasionally mentioned that it was a house of worship that burned down Holy Week. Any old place where people have gathered to worship is God is sanctified as far as we’re concerned, and we reckon its loss is a loss to humanity.
In Mark Twain’s brilliantly scathing travelogue “Innocents Abroad” he describes a group of American tourists marveling at the beautiful cathedrals of Europe, and posits a strong argument that the congregants would have done better to upgrade all the dilapidated homes that surrounded their church. We’re member of a protestant denomination at the opposite side of the low-church-high-church side of Christianity from Catholicism, a group which actually prides itself on its very plain buildings that never cost of any its members needed home repairs, so we’re sympathetic to Twain’s atheistic argument, but we wish he could have appreciated the beauty of a church.
Our dwindling congregation over in the rough Delano district has a very attractive Depression-era brick-and-stone castle-looking building, but lately has been meeting in the newly-built annex where we’re seated closer together, and there’s another Church of Christ down south in Peck next door to a hippie friend of ours that’s a gorgeously humble Norman Rockwell white clapboard and looks like a imminent tinderbox given the aging electrical system it probably has. There’s a brown clapboard Foursquare Apostolic Church down the street that might or might not still holding services, so far as we can tell as we pass by, and there’s something quite beautiful about it despite the fading paint.
Despite our low church Protestant upbringing, we’ve always felt a sense of awe at the truth and beauty inside some of those Catholic and Episcopal and Greek Orthodox churches that mere humans built to glorify God. The Cathedral of the Plains up in Victoria, Kansas, and war and church hero Father Kapaun’s old St. John Nupemucene in Pilsen Kansas, and the St. Joseph Catholic Church just around the corner from the West Douglas Church of Christ all inspire the awe of our primitive Christian souls. We’re told that the Notre Dame Cathedral was even more beautiful, so it’s hard to comprehend the loss.
We feel the same respectful feelings for synagogues, mosques, temples, and anywhere else people meet to find God, rather than what’s merely modern, and we mourn anytime they are destroyed. The blaze at Notre Dame was reportedly just one of those things that sometimes happen to 700-year-old buildings, unlike the arson of madmen who routinely burn down synagogues and mosques and temples and the churches where black Christians worship, or even the most just wars that have destroyed countless houses of worship, so we’ll take some comfort in that.
The stone structure of the Cathedral of Notre Dame has reportedly survived, so with the help of the government and its dwindling congregation the church might yet be rebuilt. The hellfire of modernity has pretty much gutted the wooden frame of the church universal, but it also has a rock-solid foundation, so during this Holy Week we hold out hope for a renaissance.

— Bud Norman

Deep in the Heart of Texas

Texas is a beautiful state, but you’d never know it by driving I-35 from Dallas to San Antonio.
We just had occasion to travel both up and down that long stretch of interstate highway, and can report that it is an unrelentingly ugly succession of oversized shopping centers, smoke-spewing factories and refineries, unfinished construction, unappealing apartment complexes, proliferating pornography shops, and an endless string of electrified signs screaming their crassly commercial messages from atop towering poles that blight the formerly scenic Texas horizon. Most of the buildings were obviously brand new, sometimes with old-fashioned touches but always with that up-to-minute modernity suggesting they are meant to be impermanent, and the surviving older structures were all in an unlovely state of disrepair, as if all the state’s energy wasbeing devoted to something newer if not better with no regard for preserving the small town charm of the recent past. There was nothing distinctively Texas about the new landscape, save for the Lone Star insignia affixed to all the concrete pillars of the countless new overpasses, as the outlet stores and restaurant chains and even the Texas Roadhouse franchises were identical to those that can be found along the urbanized highways of any other state in the union.
Our leftist friends will say that this is what unrestrained capitalism looks like, and it is most painful to admit that they might be right. The conservative can rightly counter that the once gloriously empty Texas plains are filling up with people because of the opportunities created by the state’s low-tax and laissez faire policies, and that the multiplicity of up-to-date businesses provide greater freedom of choice to the hard-working proletariat that has clearly prospered from the resulting booming economy, but even so there is no denying that the results along the interstate are not pleasing to the eye.
Which is not to say that some bossy know-it-all with a supposedly more refined aesthetic sensibility should be given the power to tell anybody else what to do with their legally acquired property. The sterile housing projects of the old Soviet bloc and the starkly concrete public works of almost any major city controlled by Democrat pols prove that central planning can be just as hideous as anything that private enterprise can spew out, and nothing currently on exhibit at the more prestigious galleries suggests that today’s cultural elite has anything better to offer. Nor does it make any sense to impoverish a people with burdensome regulations and authoritarian aesthetic regimes just to spruce up their surroundings.
There is no good reason, though, that a truly free market shouldn’t be at least a little easier on the eyes. The pretty old parts of town that lie beyond the interstate were the products of free men and women exercising their right to express their own tastes, and indeed their beauty derives from that very individualism, so the only explanation for the contrast is that people had better taste back then. Our leftist friends will have to admit that their side has long controlled the educational system which is supposed to teach some appreciation for beauty, no matter how much that admission might pain them, and an even more oppressive uniformity seems to be the inevitable outcome of the modern liberal’s agenda, so surely capitalism shouldn’t bear all the blame, but that doesn’t mean conservatives shouldn’t stop from time to time to consider how their creations will look along the interstate.
Capitalism is an essential cornerstone of conservatism, but it is by no means the only one. The conservative project is to conserve all good things that civilization has bequeathed to is current cohort of descendants, from the Judeo-Christian ethic to democratic republicanism to the best of art, archictecture, and commerce. Conservatives should resist the contemporary culture’s obsession with right now, push back against its disdain for the past and disregard for the future, and insist on something that will stand the test of time. They should insist on an economic model that doesn’t bankrupt the coming generations, they should fight for social policies that reflect the time-honored values of freedom and individualism, and they should strive for a more pleasant drive along the interstate.

— Bud Norman